Location: Waterbodies Across the District
Project Type: Capital Projects
Project Status: Active
Current Status: The District is currently tracking carp locations using radio-tags to determine where and when the invasive carp congregate in Spring and Prior Lakes. This is part of a three year grant project (2015-2018) with the assistance of WSB & Associates. See below for more details.
You can follow the locations of the tagged carp in Prior and Spring Lake on our Where are the carp? page. There are two maps so you can follow the carp based on their tracking date or fish name. Students from local area classrooms named individual fish and are following the locations of their fish online.
About this Project:
In 2002, Spring Lake and Upper Prior Lake were listed on Minnesota’s 303(d) List of Impaired Waters for nutrient/eutrophication biological indicators and aquatic recreation on both lakes is impaired. The 2012 Spring Lake and Upper Prior Lake TMDL Implementation Plan identified internal loading, including the load from rough fish and curly-leaf pondweed, as a source of roughly half of the phosphorus internal loading to the lakes. The plan went further to identify rough fish management as a way to significantly reduce estimated P loading.
As a result, the District put together an Integrated Pest Management Plan (IPM) for Common Carp in 2017 to come up with a plan to reduce the Common Carp population in the District. This plan is meant to be a working document which is updated as new strategies and goals are incorporated into the plan.
The District’s carp management project maximizes water quality restoration and remediation by addressing one of the root causes of internal loading identified in the TMDL for Spring and Upper Prior Lakes. Carp stir up sediment from the lake bottom when they forage for food. This re-suspended sediment makes more phosphorus available to phytoplankton and increases the shading effect on native submergent aquatic vegetation. Aquatic vegetation sequesters phosphorus but when the plants do not receive as much sunlight, the plant populations will be reduced and less phosphorus will be stored in the plants. Carp also feed directly on or uproot vegetation, further increasing the level of phosphorus in the water column. By removing the carp from the system, both the phosphorus within the carp carcass and the amount that would typically be excreted will be completely removed, while also abating the release of phosphorus created by foraging behavior.
This project uses integrated pest management (IPM) principles to effectively manage the common carp population within the basin. IPM involves the use of targeted carp removals and barriers, as well as monitoring environmental parameters that can inhibit or promote carp population growth within the Spring and Prior Lakes basins. Adaptive management will use the carp population data that is collected including population and biomass estimates as well as migration routes and winter aggregation locations.
The District is currently undertaking a three year study (2015-2018) with the assistance of WSB & Associates to determine where and when the invasive carp congregate in Spring and Prior Lakes. This information will be used to maximize success in population removal efforts and to identify strategic locations for carp barriers in order to block them from spawning areas.
During the first week of November (2015), seven carp from Spring Lake were caught for tagging. The carp were first sedated with clove oil and then a radio-tag was surgically implanted into the fish before it was released back into the lake. Fish in Upper and Lower Prior Lake were a bit more difficult to catch, but eight carp were finally tagged the first week of January (2016). An additional fifteen carp will be tagged later in 2016. Go to the PLSLWD YouTube Channel to view a video of Tony, from WSB & Associates, inserting radio-tags.
The radio-tags are allowing the District to track the movements of the invasive carp throughout the two lakes. The goal is to learn where the carp congregate in the lake and surrounding streams throughout the year. This will allow future carp removal efforts to be more successful as we can target areas where we know the carp are congregating. Be sure to check out our Where are the Carp? page to track the movements of the carp throughout the lakes!
The radio-tags will also enable the District to track the carp in the spring as they head to their spawning areas. Some of the carp spawning areas are located in the streams and wetlands connected to Spring and Prior Lake but located outside of the lakes themselves. Once the District knows where the carp spawn, carp barriers will be installed to prevent the carp from reaching their spawning areas. Denying the carp access to their preferred spawning areas should reduce the carp population growth in Spring and Prior Lake.
The PLSLWD has been involved in an annual carp tournament since 2013. This event engages residents in a fun way to reduce carp populations on Prior Lake and Spring Lake. Trophies have been given for biggest fish and largest haul of the tournament. In 2016 team “Killin’ Time” won first place for largest haul for their catch of 177.5 pounds of carp! Team “Fern Bros” won first place for biggest fish – for the second year in a row! Visit our Volunteer Events page for more information on this and other opportunities to get involved with the District.
Reduction in carp population and improvement of the ecosystem. By removing the carp from the system, both the phosphorus within the carp carcass and the amount that would typically be excreted will be completely removed, while also abating the release of phosphorus created by foraging behavior.
Related News Articles
Know Thy Enemy – Prior Lake American, November 2015
Stirring up trouble: Solving the carp problem in our lakes – Scott County SCENE, August/September 2014
Fish tourney nets plenty of carp – Prior Lake American, June 2013
Stay updated with this project through the PLSLWD News and Events Blog.
Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment
WSB & Associates
Funding for this project was partially provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency through a Grant from the State’s Clean Water Partnership Grant Fund.